Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2774 14
Original file (NR2774 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

aorcAatT WP IAL meomAomc

BUARU FOR CORRLY! IOW OF NAMAL Feo ores

ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No.NRO2774-14
3 september 2ZU14

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TO: Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.5.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

 

(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Sex 2812/0250
of 8 Aug 2014

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that
the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was
advanced to E-4/HM3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement
cycle vice September 2015 advancement cycle.

 

the corrective ac
available evidence of record. Documentary
the Board consisted of the enclosures, na

applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit
and warrants favorable action.
Docket No.NRO2774-14

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following

corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:

 

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-4/HM3 from the March 2013
Navy-wide advancement exam with an effective date of 16 October
2013 with a Time In Rate date of 1 duly 2013:

b. Petitioner is authorized all back pay and allowances
from the effective date forward.

c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s

proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ji |
4 fL-
LY) \

ASH

ON

KY C
a

  
 

DAVI
Recor

Bs Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, 1t is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

3 September 2014

   

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Fxecutive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8481 14

    Original file (NR8481 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION Upon...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12694-09

    Original file (12694-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to HM3/E-4 from the September 2008 Navy-wide cycle 200 advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5315 14

    Original file (NR5315 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7071S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to grade his March .2014 Navy-wide advancement exam to his-September 2013 missed exam cycle. The Board, consisting ¢ ny reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2970 14

    Original file (NR2970 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her Performance Mark Average (PMA) for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle 212 should have been 3.8 vice 3.7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8251 14

    Original file (NR8251 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to &-4/LS3 from the September 2013 Navy -wide advancement examination cycle. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Vogt, and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7389 14

    Original file (NR7389 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 764 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-4/MC3 from the September 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination cycle. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. Midboe reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and, pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4426 14

    Original file (NR4426 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS an4.& SOURTHOUSF RO SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR04426-14 15 October 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tow Secretary of the Navy Ret: (a) Title 10 U.s.c. -Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to H-6/YNi from the February 2013...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2740 14

    Original file (NR2740 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4497 14

    Original file (NR4497 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, with this Board requesting, in effect, that record be corrected to show that he was from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement filed enclosure (1) the applicable naval advanced to E-5/FC2 cycle. NRO4497-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in Light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. S. Pursuant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0500 14

    Original file (NR0500 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-4/1T3 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. If the score received mects or exceeds the score that was previously required for advancement, Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on the...